Thanks for the summary Atin.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 7:30 PM Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And now for last 15 days:./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t 18 ==> Fixed through https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22481/, I don't see this failing in brick mux post 5th April
./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t 17 ==> happens only in brick mux, needs analysis.
./tests/basic/uss.t 15 ==> happens in both brick mux and non brick mux runs, test just simply times out. Needs urgent analysis.
./tests/basic/ec/ec-fix-openfd.t 13 ==> Fixed through https://review.gluster.org/#/c/22508/ , patch merged today.
./tests/basic/volfile-sanity.t 8 ==> Some race, though this succeeds in second attempt every time.
Can volfile-sanity.t be failing because of the 'hang' in uss.t ? It is possible as volfile-sanity.t runs after uss.t in regressions. I checked volfile-sanity.t, but it has 'cleanup' at the beginning, but not sure if there are any lingering things which caused these failures.
_______________________________________________There're plenty more with 5 instances of failure from many tests. We need all maintainers/owners to look through these failures and fix them, we certainly don't want to get into a stage where master is unstable and we have to lock down the merges till all these failures are resolved. So please help.(Please note fstat stats show up the retries as failures too which in a way is right)On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:27 PM Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[1] captures the test failures report since last 30 days and we'd need volunteers/component owners to see why the number of failures are so high against few tests.
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
