Now that I've fixed the paths, the attached report is a more accurate representation.
Regretfully, it's not easy to apply as a patch.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 9:53 AM Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not sure I'm using it correctly and I'm having trouble compiling it from source on my F29 machine, but include-what-you-use (https://include-what-you-use.org ) allows you to easily analyze your include statements and ensure accuracy. I believe it has found some issues in our code - I certainly could remove some unneeded includes - but I'm unsure if I need to follow all of its advises to make things work, otherwise something will surely break.Attached please find the full analysis - hope it's useful for someone. I believe once we figure out how to use it properly, it can be a good tool - will probably reduce compile time in a negligible way too.Y.
Attachment:
include.txt.gz
Description: application/gzip
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel