Re: [Gluster-users] On making ctime generator enabled by default in stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:41 PM Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:31 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:58 AM Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:56 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,

There is a patch [1] from Kotresh, which makes ctime generator as default in stack. Currently ctime generator is being recommended only for usecases where ctime is important (like for Elasticsearch). However, a reliable (c)(m)time can fix many consistency issues within glusterfs stack too. These are issues with caching layers having stale (meta)data [2][3][4]. Basically just like applications, components within glusterfs stack too need a time to find out which among racing ops (like write, stat, etc) has latest (meta)data.

Also note that a consistent (c)(m)time is not an optional feature, but instead forms the core of the infrastructure. So, I am proposing to merge this patch. If you've any objections, please voice out before Nov 13, 2018 (a week from today).

As to the existing known issues/limitations with ctime generator, my conversations with Kotresh, revealed following:
* Potential performance degradation (we don't yet have data to conclusively prove it, preliminary basic tests from Kotresh didn't indicate a significant perf drop).

Do we have this data captured somewhere? If not, would it be possible to share that data here?

I misquoted Kotresh. He had measured impact of gfid2path and said both features might've similar impact as major perf cost is related to storing xattrs on backend fs. I am in the process of getting a fresh set of numbers. Will post those numbers when available.
 

I observe that the patch under discussion has been merged now [1]. A quick search did not yield me any performance data. Do we have the performance numbers posted somewhere?

No. Perf benchmarking is a task pending on me.
 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux