Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Master branch lock down for stabilization (unlocking the same)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:55 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/13/2018 02:20 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>     - At the end of 2 weeks, reassess master and nightly test status, and
>     see if we need another drive towards stabilizing master by locking down
>     the same and focusing only on test and code stability around the same.
>
>
> When will there be a discussion about coming up with guidelines to
> prevent lock down in future?

A thread for the same is started in the maintainers list.

Could you point me to the thread please? I am only finding a thread with subject "Lock down period merge process"

>
> I think it is better to lock-down specific components by removing commit
> access for the respective owners for those components when a test in a
> particular component starts to fail.

Also I suggest we move this to the maintainers thread, to keep the noise
levels across lists in check.

Thanks,
Shyam


--
Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux