Why not revert, fix and resubmit (unless you can quickly fix it)?
Y.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 5:04 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Will take a look._______________________________________________On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it was abandoned.-KrutikaOn Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is :commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8cAuthor: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're modified while in cacheKrutika, can you take a look and fix this?To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure.regards,NithyaOn 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is called on the mount point causing the test to fail:With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files inside it.[root@rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mountedtotal 0----------. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-1----------. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-2----------. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-3----------. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-4----------. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 file-5d---------. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdirTrying againtotal 3-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-1-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-2-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-3-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-4-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug 3 14:06 file-5d---------. 0 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 subdir[root@rhgs313-6 ~]#This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see which patch caused this.regards,NithyaOn 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherjee83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:--On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai <spalai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Will have a look at it and update.There’s already a patch from Mohit for this.Susant_______________________________________________On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:_______________________________________________On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5 times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/centos7-regression/1955/ .Request the component owners to take a look at it.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel--Atin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
