Re: FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





The outcome is to get existing maintained release branches building and
working on FreeBSD, would that be correct?

If so I think we can use the cherry-picked version, the changes seem
mostly straight forward, and it is possibly easier to maintain.

Although, I have to ask, what is the downside of not taking it in at
all? If it is just FreeBSD, then can we live with the same till release-
is out?

Finally, thanks for checking as the patch is not a simple bug-fix backport.



We also have the option of turning off FreeBSD builds for previous release branches. If you choose to not take the patches in to release branches.

--
nigelb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux