On 03/12/2018 10:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > * > > After 4.1, we want to move to either continuous numbering (like > Fedora), or time based (like ubuntu etc) release numbers. Which > is the model we pick is not yet finalized. Happy to hear opinions. > > > Not sure how the time based release numbers would make more sense than > the one which Fedora follows. But before I comment further on this I > need to first get a clarity on how the op-versions will be managed. I'm > assuming once we're at GlusterFS 4.1, post that the releases will be > numbered as GlusterFS5, GlusterFS6 ... So from that perspective, are we > going to stick to our current numbering scheme of op-version where for > GlusterFS5 the op-version will be 50000? Say, yes. The question is why tie the op-version to the release number? That mental model needs to break IMO. With current options like, https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/op_version/ it is easier to determine the op-version of the cluster and what it should be, and hence this need not be tied to the gluster release version. Thoughts? Shyam _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
