On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Meeting date: 03/07/2018 (March 3rd, 2018. 19:30IST, 14:00UTC, 09:00EST) > > BJ Link > > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 > Download : https://bluejeans.com/s/mOGb7 > > Attendance > > [Sorry Note] : Atin (conflicting meeting), Michael Adam, Amye, Niels de Vos, > Amar, Nigel, Jeff, Shyam, Kaleb, Kotresh > > Agenda > > AI from previous meeting: > > Email on version numbers: Still pending - Amar/Shyam > > Planning to do this by Friday (9th March) > > can we run regression suite with GlusterD2 > > OK with failures, but can we run? > Nigel to run tests and give outputs Apologies for not attending this meeting. I can help get this up and running. But, I also wanted to setup a smoke job to run GD2 CI against glusterfs patches. This will help us catch changes that adversly affect GD2, in particular changes to the option_t and xlator_api_t structs. Will not be a particularly long test to run. On average the current GD2 centos-ci jobs finish in under 4 minutes. I expect that building glusterfs will add about 5 minutes more. This job should be simple enough to get setup, and I'd like it if can set this up first. > > Line coverage tests: > > SIGKILL was sent to processes, so the output was not proper. > Patch available, Nigel to test with the patch and give output before > merging. > [Nigel] what happens with GD2 ? > > [Shyam] https://github.com/gojp/goreportcard > [Shyam] (what I know) > https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/gluster/glusterd2 > > Gluster 4.0 is tagged: > > Retrospect meeting: Can this be google form? > > It usually is, let me find and paste the older one: > > 3.10 retro: > http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-February/030127.html > 3.11 retro: https://www.gluster.org/3-11-retrospectives/ > > [Nigel] Can we do it a less of form, and keep it more generic? > [Shyam] Thats what mostly the form tries to do. Prefer meeting & Form > > Gluster Infra team is testing the distributed testing framework contributed > from FB > > [Nigel] Any issues, would like to collaborate > [Jeff] Happy to collaborate, let me know. > > Call out for features on 4-next > > should the next release be LTM and 4.1 and then pick the version number > change proposal later. > > Bugzilla Automation: > > Planning to test it out next week. > AI: send the email first, and target to take the patches before next > maintainers meeting. > > Round Table > > [Kaleb] space is tight on download.gluster.org > * may we delete, e.g. purpleidea files? experimental (freebsd stuff from > 2014)? > * any way to get more space? > * [Nigel] Should be possible to do it, file a bug > * AI: Kaleb to file a bug > * > > yesterday I noticed that some files (…/3.12/3.12.2/Debian/…) were not owned > by root:root. They were rsync_aide:rsync_aide. Was there an aborted rsync > job or something that left them like that? > > most glusterfs 4.0 packages are on download.g.o now. Starting on gd2 > packages now. > > el7 packages on on buildroot if someone (shyam?) wants to get a head start > on testing them > > [Nigel] Testing IPv6 (with IPv4 on too), only 4 tests are consistently > failing. Need to look at it. > > > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts) > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
