Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.13: (STM release) Details

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/31/2017 02:52 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
        @maintainers on the patch review, please ensure that we have a
        github
        reference for features, else there is a lot we will miss for the
        same!


    This was a miss from my end where I should have checked the
    corresponding issue id in the patch. Apologies!


Can we have a job to check if a bugzilla is used upstream against a patch which has a FutureFeature as a keyword, we fail such jobs to automate such misses not to happen? And then RFEs can be closed using github references?

Is the keyword followed diligently, that we can rely on such a check?

Who adds the keyword to BZ in case others missed adding the same?

I ask, as I was unaware of this keyword myself.

Shyam
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux