On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:41:54PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > > > > Q: Can patches of a series be merged before all patches in the series > > have a +2? Initial changes that prepare things, or add new (unused) core > > functionalities should be mergable so that follow-up patches can be > > posted against the HEAD of the branch. > > > > A: Nigel? > > > > If you have patches that are dependent like this: > > A -> B -> C -> D > > where A is the first patch and B is based on top of A and so forth. > > Merging A is not dependent on B. It can be merged any time you have Code Review > and Regression votes. > > However, you cannot merge B until A is ready or merged. If A is unmerged, but > is ready to merge, when you merge B, Gerrit will merge them in order, i.e. > first merge A, and B automatically. > > Does this answer your question? If it helps, I can arrange for staging to be > online so moe people can test this out. That answers my question, I don't need to try it out myself. Thanks! Niels _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
