Raghvendra,
I have provided my comment on this patch.
I think EC will not have any issue with this approach.
However, I would welcome comments from Xavi and Pranith too for any side effects which I may not be able to foresee.
Ashish
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspandey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:29:48 AM
Subject: Need inputs on patch #17985
Hi Ashish,
Following are the blockers for making a decision on whether patch [1] can be merged or not:
* Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht
* Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod etc) hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode
Can you please comment on the patch? I'll take care of dht part.
[1] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17985/
regards,
Raghavendra
To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspandey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:29:48 AM
Subject: Need inputs on patch #17985
* Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht
* Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod etc) hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode
Raghavendra
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
