On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/25/2017 02:56 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> >> >> >> Further changes: >> - No new milestone assigned, IOW not moved to 4.0 by default, >> hence contributors working on these features would need to rekindle >> conversations on including the same in 4.0 on the ML or on the issue >> itself. >> >> >> I would like us to push the changes for 'tiering' which Hari was working >> on as an experimental enhancements (They seem to be feature enhancements in >> glusterd to enable extra options for add-brick and remove-brick). Mainly >> because with glusterfs 4.0 we will have glusterd2, and all those efforts >> would be gone. By the looks of it, most of the patches are not causing any >> regression failures at least. >> >> I would recommend to mark them experimental features of 3.12 branch. >> >> Any feedback? Left to release branch maintainers I guess. > > > Considering the fact that glusterd2 would be a the way forward in 4.0, the > patches that you mention are good candidates to get into 3.12, as this is > possibly the last release where we should be working on glusterd related > major feature changes. > > The patch in question looks to be: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17693/ > (experimental) and https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15503/ (in master with a > merge conflict). > > @hari, can you address the patch merge issue on master, and also @glusterd > team, can we get this reviewed in time? I'll address the merge conflicts and update the patch on master. > > Are there other patches that are in line for the same? the other patch is https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15740/ > > Shyam > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- Regards, Hari Gowtham. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
