On Mon, Jul 17, 2017, at 09:28 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
It appears that something changed in https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17771. The tarball with the logs for that patch was 32G. That doesn't sound right. Is something writing to log excessively after this patch landed?
I don't see anything in the patch itself, or in its immediate predecessors, that would account for this. However, it could be a less direct kind of effect. I'll take a look.
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
