Re: [Gluster-users] Replicated volume, one slow brick

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Adding gluster-devel

Raghavendra,

     I remember we discussing about handling these kinds of errors by ping-timer expiry? I may have missed the final decision on how this was decided to be handled. So asking you again ;-)

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Øyvind Krosby <oyvind@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have been trying to figure out how glusterfs-fuse client will handle it when 1 of 3 bricks in a 3-way replica is slower than the others.

It looks like a glusterfs-fuse client will send requests to all 3 bricks when accessing a file. But what happens when one of the bricks is not responding in time?

We saw an issue when we added external load to the raid volume where the brick was located. The disk became 100% busy, and as a result the glusterfs-clients hang when they access the volume.

Is there a way to avoid this, and make the clients ask the other two bricks for the data when one brick is too slow?

Thanks

Øyvind Krosby

SRE, Zedge.net

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

--

Pranith

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel