On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Anoop C S <anoopcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:35 +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hi Pranith and Xavi,
>
> We seem to be running into a problem with glusto tests when we try to run them against dispersed
> volumes over a CIFS mount[1].
Is this a new test case? If not was it running successfully before?
> You can find the logs attached to the job [2].
VFS stat call failures are seen in Samba logs:
[2017/06/29 11:01:55.959374, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_glusterfs.c:870(vfs_gluster_ stat)
glfs_stat(.) failed: Invalid argument
I could also see the following errors(repeatedly..) in glusterfs client logs:
[2017-06-29 10:33:43.031198] W [MSGID: 122019] [ec-helpers.c:412:ec_loc_gfid_check] 0-
testvol_distributed-dispersed-disperse-0: Mismatching GFID's in loc
[2017-06-29 10:33:43.031303] I [MSGID: 109094] [dht-common.c:1016:dht_revalidate_cbk] 0-
testvol_distributed-dispersed-dht: Revalidate: subvolume testvol_distributed-dispersed- disperse-0
for /user11 (gfid = 665c515b-3940-480f-af7c-6aaf37731eaa) returned -1 [Invalid argument]
This log basically says that EC received loc which has different gfids in loc->inode->gfid and loc->gfid.
> I've triggered a fresh job[3] to confirm that it only fails in these particular conditions and
> certainly seems to be the case. The job is currently ongoing, so you may want to take a look when
> you get some time how this job went.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or need more debugging information.
>
> [1]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/testReport/
> [2]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/artifact/
> [3]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/326/console
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
