Re: __synclock_lock(), pthread_cond_wait(...) and spurious wake-ups

[Milind Changire <mchangir@xxxxxxxxxx>]

never mind this, people

this was in haste

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Milind Changire <mchangir@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

in __synclock_lock ( ) there's a pthread_cond_wait (&lock->cond, &lock->guard); near the end of the function ...

shouldn't the return value of pthread_cond_wait (...) be checked in a while loop to test for spurious wake-ups and also test the logical state that the lock variable to be in to hold ?

--

Milind

--

Milind

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel