Hi Niels,
No problem we wil try to backport that patch on 3.7.6. On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:08:06PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote:
> We are using 3.7.6 and on link https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279 status
> is "can't merge"
Note that 3.7.x will not get any updates anymore. We currently maintain
version 3.8.x, 3.10.x and 3.11.x. See the release schedele for more
details:
https://www.gluster.org/community/release-schedule/
Niels
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumball@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This is already part of 3.11.0 release?
> >
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Atin,
> >>
> >> Could you please let us know any time plan for deliver of this patch.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Abhishek
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Actually it is very risky if it will reproduce in production thats is
> >>> why I said it is on high priority as want to resolve it before production.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:10 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
> >>>> abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Atin,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your reply.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Its urgent because this error is very rarely reproducible we have seen
> >>>>> this 2 3 times in our system till now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have delivery in near future so that we want it asap. Please try to
> >>>>> review it internally.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't think your statements justified the reason of urgency as (a)
> >>>> you have mentioned it to be *rarely* reproducible and (b) I am still
> >>>> waiting for a real use case where glusterd will go through multiple
> >>>> restarts in a loop?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Abhishek
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:37 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
> >>>>>> abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> + Muthu-vingeshwaran
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
> >>>>>>> abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Atin/Team,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We are using gluster-3.7.6 with setup of two brick and while
> >>>>>>>> restart of system I have seen that the glusterd daemon is getting failed
> >>>>>>>> from start.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> At the time of analyzing the logs from etc-glusterfs.......log file
> >>>>>>>> I have received the below logs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.798087] I [MSGID: 100030]
> >>>>>>>> [glusterfsd.c:2348:main] 0-/usr/sbin/glusterd: Started running
> >>>>>>>> /usr/sbin/glusterd version 3.7.6 (args: /usr/sbin/glusterd -p
> >>>>>>>> /var/run/glusterd.pid --log-level INFO)
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.807859] I [MSGID: 106478]
> >>>>>>>> [glusterd.c:1350:init] 0-management: Maximum allowed open file descriptors
> >>>>>>>> set to 65536
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.807974] I [MSGID: 106479]
> >>>>>>>> [glusterd.c:1399:init] 0-management: Using /system/glusterd as working
> >>>>>>>> directory
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.826833] I [MSGID: 106513]
> >>>>>>>> [glusterd-store.c:2047:glusterd_restore_op_version] 0-glusterd:
> >>>>>>>> retrieved op-version: 30706
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.827515] E [MSGID: 106206]
> >>>>>>>> [glusterd-store.c:2562:glusterd_store_update_volinfo]
> >>>>>>>> 0-management: Failed to get next store iter
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.827563] E [MSGID: 106207]
> >>>>>>>> [glusterd-store.c:2844:glusterd_store_retrieve_ volume]
> >>>>>>>> 0-management: Failed to update volinfo for c_glusterfs volume
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.827625] E [MSGID: 106201]
> >>>>>>>> [glusterd-store.c:3042:glusterd_store_retrieve_ volumes]
> >>>>>>>> 0-management: Unable to restore volume: c_glusterfs
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.827722] E [MSGID: 101019]
> >>>>>>>> [xlator.c:428:xlator_init] 0-management: Initialization of volume
> >>>>>>>> 'management' failed, review your volfile again
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.827762] E [graph.c:322:glusterfs_graph_init]
> >>>>>>>> 0-management: initializing translator failed
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.827784] E [graph.c:661:glusterfs_graph_activate]
> >>>>>>>> 0-graph: init failed
> >>>>>>>> [2017-05-06 03:33:39.828396] W [glusterfsd.c:1238:cleanup_and_exit]
> >>>>>>>> (-->/usr/sbin/glusterd(glusterfs_volumes_init- 0x1b0b8)
> >>>>>>>> [0x1000a648] -->/usr/sbin/glusterd(glusterfs_process_volfp- 0x1b210)
> >>>>>>>> [0x1000a4d8] -->/usr/sbin/glusterd(cleanup_and_exit-0x1beac)
> >>>>>>>> [0x100097ac] ) 0-: received signum (0), shutting down
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Abhishek,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch needs to be thoroughly reviewed to ensure that it doesn't
> >>>>>> cause any regression given this touches on the core store management
> >>>>>> functionality of glusterd. AFAICT, we get into an empty info file only when
> >>>>>> volume set operation is executed and in parallel one of the glusterd
> >>>>>> instance in other nodes have been brought down and whole sequence of
> >>>>>> operation happens in a loop. The test case through which you can get into
> >>>>>> this situation is not something you'd hit in production. Please help me to
> >>>>>> understand the urgency here.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also in one of the earlier thread, I did mention the workaround of
> >>>>>> this issue back to Xin through http://lists.gluster.org/piper
> >>>>>> mail/gluster-users/2017-January/029600.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "If you end up in having a 0 byte info file you'd need to copy the same info file from other node and put it there and restart glusterd"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have found one of the existing case is there and also solution
> >>>>>>>> patch is available but the status of that patch in "cannot merge". Also the
> >>>>>>>> "info" file is empty and "info.tmp" file present in "lib/glusterd/vol"
> >>>>>>>> directory.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Below is the link of the existing case.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279/5
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> please let me know what is the plan of community to provide the
> >>>>>>>> solution of this problem and in which version.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> Abhishek Paliwal
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> Abhishek Paliwal
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Abhishek Paliwal
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Abhishek Paliwal
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Abhishek Paliwal
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gluster-devel mailing list
> >> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Amar Tumballi (amarts)
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Abhishek Paliwal
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
