Re: Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Or this one: https://review.gluster.org/15036
>
> This is backported to 3.8/10 and 3.11 and considering the size and impact of
> the change, I wanted to be sure that we are going to accept this across all
> 3 releases?
>
> @Du, would like your thoughts on this.
>
> @niels, @kaushal, @talur, as release owners, could you weigh in as well
> please.
>
> I am thinking that we get this into 3.11.1 if there is agreement, and not in
> 3.11.0 as we are finalizing the release in 3 days, and this change looks
> big, to get in at this time.
>
> Further the change is actually an enhancement, and provides performance
> benefits, so it is valid as a change itself, but I feel it is too late to
> add to the current 3.11 release.

Considering 3.10 is a long term support release, I would like to take
this patch only after it has been in a release for sometime and not
right now. Will it be acceptable to all if this patch makes it to say
3.10.4 or 3.10.5 after Shyam takes this in 3.11.1?

>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux