Re: Release 3.11: RC1 is tagged!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/24/2017 12:21 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote:


On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 05/24/2017 02:05 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:

        Was looking at Milestone in Github:
        https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+3.11+%28STM%29%22
        <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+3.11+%28STM%29%22>

        It is still showing many things as open. I see some of them are
        done for
        sure. Please feel free to mark them as 'Closed'. Ideal to have
        commit id
        (from git log) while closing.


    This is intentional Amar. The idea being once we have delivered all
    pieces we can mark if as closed.

    All pieces are design+code+documentation, IOW commits for
    gluster-specs, glusterfs, and release notes/glusterdocs commits.

    Once we have that in place, we can close the issue (even prior to
    the actual release). If not post the final release, I will cleanup
    the items in the lane as appropriate.

    Thoughts?


Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking of PR / patch having 'fixes #NNN',
which means automatically an issue would be closed. Hence the question.

Exactly, so let's say the last piece is the release notes, then that commit can/should contain the 'fixes #NNN' message and things will get done automatically.


Makes sense to keep it open if there is a piece pending from the
feature, no issues there, rather that is the proper way.

+1.

Regards,
Amar



        -Amar

        On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:

            On 05/23/2017 09:27 AM, Shyam wrote:

                A note on release notes:

                1) release-notes are a part of the code repository,
        hence use
                gerrit to
                submit your changes to the release notes


            Here is an example: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17372/
        <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17372/>
            <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17372/
        <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17372/>>


                2) Also, as we use github for features, and most content
        that
                would be
                submitted to the release notes would be for features,
        use the
                same issue
                # as the code submission to submit the release notes
        changes as
                well.

                For example, to submit release notes for "Enhance handleops
                readdirplus
                operation to return handles along with dirents", use
        "Updates:
                #174" in
                the release notes commit message. There is *no* *need*
        for a BUG

                The advantages of this are that, we can track all
        submissions
                for said
                feature from the same issue in github (all submissions
        refers to
                feature-spec, code, release-notes, documentation changes).


            Here is how it gets reflected in the issue:

        https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/174#issuecomment-303403925
        <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/174#issuecomment-303403925>

        <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/174#issuecomment-303403925
        <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/174#issuecomment-303403925>>



                3) If a release-note is being added for a non-feature
        (say a warning
                about some feature, or that some functionality is still
                experimental,
                IOW things that do not have github issues), then use a
        bug for the
                submission as before.

                Thanks,
                Shyam

                "Releases are made better together"

                On 05/22/2017 09:37 PM, Shyam wrote:

                    Hi,

                    We just finished tagging release 3.11.0 RC1, that
        contains a
                    few more
                    fixes post 3.11.0 RC0.

                    Packages for the same will be made available soon.

                    *Attention* contributors:
                      - We still are to see any updates to the release-notes
                    [2], we have a
                    week before the release, please update the release notes
                    appropriately

                    *Attention* all:
                      - Any pending bugs that are critical to the
        release need
                    to be marked
                    as a blocker against [1] and we have about a week
        left to
                    close out
                    these bugs!

                    Thanks,
                    Shyam

                    [1] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers:

        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0
        <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0>

        <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0
        <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0>>

                    [2] Release notes:

        https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.11/doc/release-notes/3.11.0.md
        <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.11/doc/release-notes/3.11.0.md>

        <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.11/doc/release-notes/3.11.0.md
        <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.11/doc/release-notes/3.11.0.md>>


                    _______________________________________________
                    Gluster-devel mailing list
                    Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>

        http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
        <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>

        <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
        <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>>

            _______________________________________________
            Gluster-devel mailing list
            Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
            http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
        <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>
            <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
        <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>>




        --
        Amar Tumballi (amarts)




--
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux