Re: Questions on github

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
<pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> People who respond on gluster-users do this already. Github issues is a
> better tool to do this (Again IMHO). It is a bit easier to know what
> questions are still open to be answered with github. Even after multiple
> responses on gluster-users mail you won't be sure if it is answered or not,
> so one has to go through the responses. Where as on github we can close it
> once answered. So these kinds of things are the reason for asking this.

Even with Github Issues, Gluster will not see a reduction of traffic
to -users/-devel asking questions about the releases. What will happen
for a (short?) while is that the project will have two inbound avenues
to look for questions and respond to them. Over a period of time, if
extreme focus and diligence is adopted, the traffic on mailing list
*might* move over to Github issues. There are obvious advantages to
using Issues. But there are also a small number of must-do things to
manage this approach.


-- 
sankarshan mukhopadhyay
<https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux