On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 07:41:29PM -0400, Shyam wrote: > Hi, > > This mail should have been out 3-4 days earlier than now as branching is 2 > days away, but hopefully it is not too late. > > The current release scope can be seen at [1]. > > If you do *not* recognize your nick in the following list then you can help > us out by looking at pending reviews [2] and moving them along and > optionally skip the rest of the mail. > > If your nick is in the list below, please read along to update status on the > action called out against you. > > nick list: @amarts, @csabahenk, @ndevos, @pranith, @kaushal, @jiffin, > @rabhat, @kaleb, @samikshan, @poornimag, @kotresh, @susant > > If any reviews for the features listed below are still open and not > appearing in [2] drop me a mail, and I will star it, so that it appears in > the list as needed. > > Status request of features targeted for 3.11: > > 1) Starting with features that slipped 3.10 and were marked for 3.11 > > 1.1) In gfapi fix memory leak during graph switch #61 > @ndevos I know a series of fixes are up for review, will this be completed > for this release, or would it be an ongoing effort across releases? If the > latter, we possibly continue tracking this for the next release as well. There are several fixes done, but it will be a topic that needs continuing for the next few releases. Until we have a way to automatically check for new problems and report bugs. > 1.2) SELinux support for Gluster Volumes #55 > Latest reviews indicate this may be ready by branching, @jiffin or @ndevos > will this make it by branching date? We hope so! The two patches should be ready, fingers crossed: - https://review.gluster.org/6630 - https://review.gluster.org/13762 ... > 3) New in 3.11 and not tracked in release scope [1] as there are no visible > mail requests to consider these for 3.11 in the gluster devel lists > > 3.1) Use standard refcounting functions #156 > @ndevos any updates? Should this be marked in the 3.11 scope? Still an ongoing thing, we have *many* structures that cna benefit from reference counting. Improvements like these are 'normal' maintenance tasks IMHO. Thanks, Niels > [1] Release scope: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/projects/1 > > [2] Reviews needing attention: > https://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
