Thanks for this detailed Email with clear instructions Niels.
Can we have this as github issues as well? I don't want this information to be lost as part of email thread in ML archive. I would like to see if I can get some interns to work on these leaks per component as part of their college project etc.On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
with the use of gfapi it has become clear that Gluster was never really
developed to be loaded in applications. There are many different memory
leaks that get exposed through the usage of gfapi. Before, memory leaks
were mostly cleaned up automatically because processes would exit. Now,
there are applications that initialize a GlusterFS client to access a
volume, and de-init that client once not needed anymore. Unfortunately
upon the de-init, not all allocated memory is free'd again. These are
often just a few bytes, but for long running processes this can become a
real problem.
Finding the memory leaks in xlators has been a tricky thing. Valgrind
would often not know what function/source the allocation did, and fixing
the leak would become a real hunt. There have been some patches merged
that make Valgrind work more easily, and a few patches still need a
little more review before everything is available. The document below
describes how to use a new "sink" xlator to detect memory leaks. This
xlator can only be merged when a change for the graph initialization is
included too:
- https://review.gluster.org/16796 - glusterfs_graph_prepare
- https://review.gluster.org/16806 - sink xlator and developer doc
It would be most welcome if other developers can reviwe the linked
changes, so that everyone can easily debug memory leaks from thair
favorite xlators.
There is a "run-xlator.sh" script in my (for now) personal
"gluster-debug" repository that can be used to load an arbitrary xlator
along with "sink". See
https://github.com/nixpanic/gluster-debug/tree/master/ gfapi-load-volfile
for more details.
Thanks,
Niels
>From doc/developer-guide/identifying-resource-leaks.md :
# Identifying Resource Leaks
Like most other pieces of software, GlusterFS is not perfect in how it manages
its resources like memory, threads and the like. Gluster developers try hard to
prevent leaking resources but releasing and unallocating the used structures.
Unfortunately every now and then some resource leaks are unintentionally added.
This document tries to explain a few helpful tricks to identify resource leaks
so that they can be addressed.
## Debug Builds
There are certain techniques used in GlusterFS that make it difficult to use
tools like Valgrind for memory leak detection. There are some build options
that make it more practical to use Valgrind and other tools. When running
Valgrind, it is important to have GlusterFS builds that contain the
debuginfo/symbols. Some distributions (try to) strip the debuginfo to get
smaller executables. Fedora and RHEL based distributions have sub-packages
called ...-debuginfo that need to be installed for symbol resolving.
### Memory Pools
By using memory pools, there are no allocation/freeing of single structures
needed. This improves performance, but also makes it impossible to track the
allocation and freeing of srtuctures.
It is possible to disable the use of memory pools, and use standard `malloc()`
and `free()` functions provided by the C library. Valgrind is then able to
track the allocated areas and verify if they have been free'd. In order to
disable memory pools, the Gluster sources needs to be configured with the
`--enable-debug` option:
```shell
./configure --enable-debug
```
When building RPMs, the `.spec` handles the `--with=debug` option too:
```shell
make dist
rpmbuild -ta --with=debug glusterfs-....tar.gz
```
### Dynamically Loaded xlators
Valgrind tracks the call chain of functions that do memory allocations. The
addresses of the functions are stored and before Valgrind exits the addresses
are resolved into human readable function names and offsets (line numbers in
source files). Because Gluster loads xlators dynamically, and unloads then
before exiting, Valgrind is not able to resolve the function addresses into
symbols anymore. Whenever this happend, Valgrind shows `???` in the output,
like
```
==25170== 344 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 233 of 324
==25170== at 0x4C29975: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
==25170== by 0x52C7C0B: __gf_calloc (mem-pool.c:117)
==25170== by 0x12B0638A: ???
==25170== by 0x528FCE6: __xlator_init (xlator.c:472)
==25170== by 0x528FE16: xlator_init (xlator.c:498)
...
```
These `???` can be prevented by not calling `dlclose()` for unloading the
xlator. This will cause a small leak of the handle that was returned with
`dlopen()`, but for improved debugging this can be acceptible. For this and
other Valgrind features, a `--enable-valgrind` option is available to
`./configure`. When GlusterFS is built with this option, Valgrind will be able
to resolve the symbol names of the functions that do memory allocations inside
xlators.
```shell
./configure --enable-valgrind
```
When building RPMs, the `.spec` handles the `--with=valgrind` option too:
```shell
make dist
rpmbuild -ta --with=valgrind glusterfs-....tar.gz
```
## Running Valgrind against a single xlator
Debugging a single xlator is not trivial. But there are some tools to make it
easier. The `sink` xlator does not do any memory allocations itself, but
contains just enough functionality to mount a volume with only the `sink`
xlator. There is a little gfapi application under `tests/basic/gfapi/` in the
GlusterFS sources that can be used to run only gfapi and the core GlusterFS
infrastructure with the `sink` xlator. By extending the `.vol` file to load
more xlators, each xlator can be debugged pretty much separately (as long as
the xlators have no dependencies on each other). A basic Valgrind run with the
suitable configure options looks like this:
```shell
./autogen.sh
./configure --enable-debug --enable-valgrind
make && make install
cd tests/basic/gfapi/
make gfapi-load-volfile
valgrind ./gfapi-load-volfile sink.vol
```
Combined with other very useful options to Valgrind, the following execution
shows many more useful details:
```shell
valgrind \
--fullpath-after= --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all \
./gfapi-load-volfile sink.vol
```
Note that the `--fullpath-after=` option is left empty, this makes Valgrind
print the full path and filename that contains the functions:
```
==2450== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 60
==2450== at 0x4C29975: calloc (/builddir/build/BUILD/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_ replacemalloc/vg_replace_ malloc.c:711)
==2450== by 0x52C6F73: __gf_calloc (/usr/src/debug/glusterfs-3.11dev/libglusterfs/src/mem- pool.c:117)
==2450== by 0x12F10CDA: init (/usr/src/debug/glusterfs-3.11dev/xlators/meta/src/meta.c: 231)
==2450== by 0x528EFD5: __xlator_init (/usr/src/debug/glusterfs-3.11dev/libglusterfs/src/xlator. c:472)
==2450== by 0x528F105: xlator_init (/usr/src/debug/glusterfs-3.11dev/libglusterfs/src/xlator. c:498)
==2450== by 0x52D9D8B: glusterfs_graph_init (/usr/src/debug/glusterfs-3.11dev/libglusterfs/src/graph. c:321)
...
```
In the above example, the `init` function in `xlators/meta/src/meta.c` does a
memory allocation on line 231. This memory is never free'd again, and hence
Valgrind logs this call stack. When looking in the code, it seems that the
allocation of `priv` is assigned to the `this->private` member of the
`xlator_t` structure. Because the allocation is done in `init()`, free'ing is
expected to happen in `fini()`. Both functions are shown below, with the
inclusion of the empty `fini()`:
```
226 int
227 init (xlator_t *this)
228 {
229 meta_priv_t *priv = NULL;
230
231 priv = GF_CALLOC (sizeof(*priv), 1, gf_meta_mt_priv_t);
232 if (!priv)
233 return -1;
234
235 GF_OPTION_INIT ("meta-dir-name", priv->meta_dir_name, str, out);
236
237 this->private = priv;
238 out:
239 return 0;
240 }
241
242
243 int
244 fini (xlator_t *this)
245 {
246 return 0;
247 }
```
In this case, the resource leak can be addressed by adding a single line to the
`fini()` function:
```
243 int
244 fini (xlator_t *this)
245 {
246 GF_FREE (this->private);
247 return 0;
248 }
```
Running the same Valgrind command and comparing the output will show that the
memory leak in `xlators/meta/src/meta.c:init` is not reported anymore.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
