On 03/24/2017 09:39 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:29:05PM -0400, Michael Scherer wrote: >> Another example: >> pub/gluster/glusterfs has various directory for versions of glusterfs, >> but also do have libvirt, vagrant and nfs-ganesha, who are not version, >> and might be rather served from a directory upstream (in fact, >> nfs-ganesha and glusterfs-coreutils are also on >> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/ ) > > A cleanup is much appreciated! Maybe come up with a proposed directory > structure and see from there what makes sense to keep or remove? > What does "from a directory upstream" mean? There is no upstream nfs-ganesha server. There are versions of nfs-ganesha, even if there aren't very many, and thus not to the same level of granularity as gluster. And .../pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha is merely a symlink to .../pub/gluster/nfs-ganesha — just a convenience. There are not two copies of it. Likewise for -coreutils and the others. I'm not opposed reorganizing the directories, but I don't believe there's really anything wrong with it, per se, the way it is now. -- Kaleb
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
