On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:28:19PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > Add basic GlusterFS support. Neither new GlusterFS specific tests > nor related patches are included. Only support FSTYP=glusterfs or > check -glusterfs XXX. > > To test on glusterfs, two gluster volumes and two mountpoint > directories are needed. > > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Hi glusterfs developers, > > Recently some people cares about testing kernel FUSE by running > xfstests. We can't test FUSE independently, we must depend upon > someone real FS base on FUSE, e.g. GlusterFS. > > This patch only want to run xfstests on glusterfs, but I haven't > made sure if there's no case bugs for glusterfs. I think that's > another problem which I will fix in later patches. > > At first I prepare two gluster volumes and two directories, then > set into xfstests/local.config. > > [root@ibm-x3650m4-10 xfstests-dev]# cat local.config > TEST_DIR=/mnt/gluster/test > TEST_DEV=ibm-xxxx-xx.redhat.com:testvol > SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/gluster/scratch > SCRATCH_DEV=ibm-xxxx-xx.redhat.com:scratchvol > > (feel free to set MOUNT_OPTIONS, or GLUSTERFS_MOUNT_OPTIONS) > > Then I ran some generic cases, e.g. g/001 and g/117, one test on > TEST_DEV, and the other run on SCRATCH_DEV: > > [root@ibm-x3650m4-10 xfstests-dev]# ./check -glusterfs generic/001 > FSTYP -- glusterfs > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 ibm-x3650m4-10 3.10.0-581.el7.x86_64 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- ibm-x3650m4-10.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com:scratchvol > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 ibm-x3650m4-10.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com:scratchvol /mnt/gluster/scratch > > generic/001 9s ... 8s > Ran: generic/001 > Passed all 1 tests > > [root@ibm-x3650m4-10 xfstests-dev]# ./check -glusterfs generic/117 > FSTYP -- glusterfs > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 ibm-x3650m4-10 3.10.0-581.el7.x86_64 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- ibm-x3650m4-10.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com:scratchvol > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 ibm-x3650m4-10.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com:scratchvol /mnt/gluster/scratch > > generic/117 24s ... 24s > Ran: generic/117 > Passed all 1 tests > > The results look good. But there're some cases fails on glusterfs, > I think that's case problem or glusterfs problems. I'll look into > them in the future. Looks fine to me. I tested with quick group and noticed some failures too, but I agreed we can fix them later if they're fstests bugs. I tend to merge this patch in this week's update, unless there're more comments from glusterfs community. > > I only know how to use "mount -t glusterfs XXXX:vol /mnt", if you > have any other requirements or suggestions, please tell me. > Welcome send more patches to fstests@ mail list:) > > Thanks, > Zorro > > README.config-sections | 7 +++++++ > check | 2 ++ > common/config | 6 ++++++ > common/rc | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/README.config-sections b/README.config-sections > index df7c929..9133997 100644 > --- a/README.config-sections > +++ b/README.config-sections > @@ -121,3 +121,10 @@ TEST_DIR=/mnt/test > TEST_DEV=192.168.14.1:6789:/ > TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS="-o name=admin,secret=AQDuEBtYKEYRINGSECRETriSC8YJGDZsQHcr7g==" > FSTYP="ceph" > + > +[glusterfs] > +FSTYP=glusterfs > +TEST_DIR=/mnt/gluster/test > +TEST_DEV=192.168.1.1:testvol > +SCRATCH_DIR=/mnt/gluster/scratch s/SCRATCH_DIR/SCRATCH_MNT/ , I can fix it at commit time. Thanks, Eryu _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
