https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1422074 was opened to support nanoseconds on Gluster Volumes. Is anyone aware of problems when we do this? This would help where applications (like backup systems) check for the difference between timestamps on original (nanosecond precision) and Gluster Volumes (microseconds rounded down). Because the original would always be newer than the copy on the Gluster Volume, incremental backups become full backups again (using 'rsync' and 'cp -u' as examples). Please leave your conserns or recommendation in the bug or reply this this email. Thanks, Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
