Can we please address this as early as possible, my patch has hit this failure 3 out of 4 recheck attempts now. I'm guessing some recent changes has caused it.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 at 12:10, Ashish Pandey <aspandey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Pranith,In this test tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t, I think the line number 86 actually creating a heal entry instead ofhelping data heal quickly. What if all the data was already healed at that moment, truncate came and in preop set the dirty flag and at theend, as part of the heal, dirty flag was unset on previous good bricks only and the brick which acted as heal-sink still has dirty marked by truncate.That is why we are only seeing "1" as get_pending_heal_count. If a file was actually not healed it should be "2".If heal on this file completes and unset of dirty flag happens before truncate everything will be fine.I think we can wait for file to be heal without truncate?71 #Test that disabling background-heals still drains the queue
72 TEST $CLI volume set $V0 disperse.background-heals 1
73 TEST touch $M0/{a,b,c,d}
74 TEST kill_brick $V0 $H0 $B0/${V0}2
75 EXPECT_WITHIN $CONFIG_UPDATE_TIMEOUT "1" mount_get_option_value $M0 $V0-disperse-0 background-heals
76 EXPECT_WITHIN $CONFIG_UPDATE_TIMEOUT "200" mount_get_option_value $M0 $V0-disperse-0 heal-wait-qlength
77 TEST truncate -s 1GB $M0/a
78 echo abc > $M0/b
79 echo abc > $M0/c
80 echo abc > $M0/d
81 TEST $CLI volume start $V0 force
82 EXPECT_WITHIN $CHILD_UP_TIMEOUT "3" ec_child_up_count $V0 0
83 TEST chown root:root $M0/{a,b,c,d}
84 TEST $CLI volume set $V0 disperse.background-heals 0
85 EXPECT_NOT "0" mount_get_option_value $M0 $V0-disperse-0 heal-waiters
86 TEST truncate -s 0 $M0/a # This completes the heal fast ;-) <<<<<<<87 EXPECT_WITHIN $HEAL_TIMEOUT "^0$" get_pending_heal_count $V0----AshishFrom: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Nithya Balachandran" <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ashish Pandey" <aspandey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 9:41:38 AM
Subject: Re: Spurious regression failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t_______________________________________________Found another failure on same test:
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2874/consoleFull----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nithya Balachandran" <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ashish Pandey"
> <aspandey@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:16:31 AM
> Subject: Spurious regression failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Can you please take a look at
> https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2859/console ?
>
> tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t has failed.
>
> Thanks,
> Nithya
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
- Atin (atinm)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
