Re: Priority based ping packet for 3.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, the earlier a fault is detected the better.

On January 24, 2017 9:21:27 PM PST, Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If there are no responses to be received and no requests being
sent to a brick, why would be a client be interested in the health of
server/brick?

The client (code) might not, but the user might want to find out and fix
the fault before the brick gets busy again.


Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux