Re: [Focus Area] Gluster Experience for Developers and Integrations (GEDI)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:22:16PM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > We would like to make it as easy as possible for other projects to get
> > in touch with the GEDI team. For that, we propose a mailinglist
> > (integration@xxxxxxxxxxx) dedicated for engineers that are involved in
> > Gluster integrations. The main gluster-devel list will most likely
> > contain too much traffic for developers that do not care about the core
> > of glusterfs. The new mailinglist may be configured to have its emails
> > *also* sent to the gluster-devel list so that a wider audience is
> > reached.
> >
> > Please let us know if there are any concerns, questions or other
> > feedback.
> >
> >
> I like the idea of routing emails from integration on gluster-devel for
> reaching out to a broader audience. Can we get it done before traffic
> starts to increase on integration ML?

We can do this, but Nigel expressed that he doesnt want it:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409790#c1

  It's the responsibility of people on the list to CC emails that are
  potentially interesting to gluster-devel@. Wholesale CCing will only
  add to the noise on gluster-devel@


I do not have a strong preference for one or the other. What do others
think?

Niels

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux