On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:22:16PM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > We would like to make it as easy as possible for other projects to get > > in touch with the GEDI team. For that, we propose a mailinglist > > (integration@xxxxxxxxxxx) dedicated for engineers that are involved in > > Gluster integrations. The main gluster-devel list will most likely > > contain too much traffic for developers that do not care about the core > > of glusterfs. The new mailinglist may be configured to have its emails > > *also* sent to the gluster-devel list so that a wider audience is > > reached. > > > > Please let us know if there are any concerns, questions or other > > feedback. > > > > > I like the idea of routing emails from integration on gluster-devel for > reaching out to a broader audience. Can we get it done before traffic > starts to increase on integration ML? We can do this, but Nigel expressed that he doesnt want it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409790#c1 It's the responsibility of people on the list to CC emails that are potentially interesting to gluster-devel@. Wholesale CCing will only add to the noise on gluster-devel@ I do not have a strong preference for one or the other. What do others think? Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
