Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches. Raghavendra's patch is crucial because gfapi workloads(for samba and qemu) are affected severely. I waited for Krutika's patch because VM usecase can lead to disk corruption on replace-brick. If you could let us know the criticality and we are in agreement that they are this severe, we can definitely take them in. Otherwise next release is better IMO. Thoughts?

If you are asking about how critical they are, then the first two are definitely not but third one is actually a critical one as if user upgrades from 3.6 to latest with quota enable, further peer probes get rejected and the only work around is to disable quota and re-enable it back.

Let me take Raghavendra G's input also here.

Raghavendra, what do you think we should do? Merge it or live with it till 3.9.1?

The commit says quota.conf is rewritten to compatible version during three operations:
1. enable/disable quota
2. limit usage
3. remove quota limit

I checked the code and it works as stated in commit msg. Probably we can list the above three operations as work around and take this patch in for 3.9.1

 

On a different note, 3.9 head is not static and moving forward. So if you are really looking at only critical patches need to go in, that's not happening, just a word of caution!


On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:




On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi,
      The only problem left was EC taking more time. This should affect small files a lot more. Best way to solve it is using compound-fops. So for now I think going ahead with the release is best.

We are waiting for Raghavendra Talur's http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15778 before going ahead with the release. If we missed any other crucial patch please let us know.

Will make the release as soon as this patch is merged.

--
Pranith & Aravinda

_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers




--

~ Atin (atinm)



--
Pranith



--

~ Atin (atinm)



--
Pranith

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



--
Raghavendra G
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux