> > We did get some regular contributions to have Gluster function on > > FreeBSD, but they seem to be more sporadic now. If nobody steps up, I > > would suggest to keep compiling on FreeBSD, but nothing more. Maybe at a > > later time someone shows more interest. > > > > NetBSD on the other hand already runs some of the regression tests. And > > it seems to hit valid problems in the code that we for whatever lucky > > reason do not hit (yet?) on Linux. I see some value in the NetBSD > > environment, and if the infra team with help from Manu can keep it > > up-to-date it would be good to have it running. > > +1 to this approach regarding BSDs. I'm ok with this approach. Can we then do the following? * Document the issues when deploying FreeBSD. * Remove any references to us officially supporting FreeBSD (are there any?) * Ask for contributions from the FreeBSD community, especially if someone wants to take over maintainership of the port. -- nigelb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
