On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 02:02:43PM -0700, Joe Julian wrote: > On 08/27/2016 12:15 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:52:11PM +0530, Aravinda wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As part of Client events support, glustereventsd needs to be configured to > > > use a port. Following ports are already used by Gluster components. > > > 24007 For glusterd > > > 24008 For glusterd RDMA port management > > > 38465 Gluster NFS service > > > 38466 Gluster NFS service > > > 38467 Gluster NFS service > > > 38468 Gluster NFS service > > > 38469 Gluster NFS service > > > 49152-49664 512 ports for bricks > > > > > > If I remember correctly, 24009+ ports were used by old GlusterFS(<3.4). In > > > the patch eventsd is using 24005. Please suggest which port glustereventsd > > > can use?(Can we use 24009 port) > > > http://review.gluster.org/15189 > > I guess you can use 24009, but it would be way better to either: > > > > a. use glusterd-portmapper and get a dynamic port 49152+ > Strongly disagree. It's enough that we have to poke dynamic holes in > firewalls already (sure it's easy with firewalld, but with hardware > firewalls or openstack security groups we just have to open a huge hole), > adding one that we also need to use as a service endpoint is too much. Heh, yes, of course. I also think it needs quite some work in glustereventsd to be able to use it, and then the clients need to request the port from glusterd before they can consume events. It is the way how other gluster clients work atm. > > b. register a port at IANA, see /etc/services > > (maybe we should try to register the 24007+24008 ports in any case) > +100 This definitely has my preference too. I've always wanted to try to register port 24007/8, and maybe the time has come to look into it. Thanks for sharing your opinion! Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
