Re: doubts in using gf_event/gf_msg

Aravinda <avishwan@xxxxxxxxxx> · Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:38:45 +0530



    It is possible to overload gf_lg/gf_msg to send events to local
      eventsd. But we have to do additional parsing if we need to select
      the logs to convert as events. If we introduce new API, then it is
      not different from existing wrt adding events code in multiple
      places. But if it helps in sharing the host/port and other
      information(which we are discussing to support client events), I
      can give it a try(Move gf_event inside logging infra)

      
    regards
Aravinda
    On Wednesday 24 August 2016 05:15 PM,
      Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:

    
      Just resending in case you missed this mail.

      
        On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:31 AM,
          Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

          
              hi Aravinda,

              
                     I was wondering what is your opinion in sending
              selected logs as events instead of treating them
              specially. Is this something you guys considered? Do you
              think it is a bad idea to do it that way? We can even come
              up with a new api which logs and then sends it as event.

                  
                      -- 

                      
                        Pranith

                        
        -- 

        
          Pranith

          
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel