On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:34:24PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:19:10AM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:07:22AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > >> > I'd like to propose renaming them to: > >> > * centos-regression > >> > * netbsd-regression > >> > >> I suggest you keep an OS version number; > >> netbsd7-regression > >> > >> That way we can introduce an OS update as experimental without > >> breaking what is known to work. > > > > +1 and this does not only count for the NetBSD jobs. At one point we > > want to run on CentOS-7 as well. Please rename the centos-regression job > > to centos6-regression so that centos7-regression can be added for > > testing easily. > > > > +1 to this approach. > > -Vijay Thank you Kaushal, Niels, Emmanuel, and Vijay. As Niels recommended, I'll set up new jobs for regression and let the old ones be. Eventually, we can delete them. Nothing should break at all. And as recommended, I'll do centos6-regression and netbsd7-regression. -- nigelb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
