Re: regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think we should compare n-1th week report with nth and any common tests
> out of that comparison having more than or equal to 3 instances of failures
> SHOULD immediately marked as bad and any component having more than 5 bad
> tests should be BLOCKED for further merges till bad tests are fixed. What do
> others think about it?
>

If we can automate this workflow, I am in favor of the proposal.

-Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux