On 08/04/2016 08:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> .... > ... >>> ./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times >>> Regression Links: >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-burn-in/1423/consoleFull >> >> I have not seen this fail yet... All gfapi tests are running in a loop >> on a test-system now, we'll see if it reproducible in a few days or so. > > It seems that glfs_fini() returns -1 every now and then (once after 1027 > iterations, once after 287). Some of the gfapi test cases actually > succeed their intended test, but still return an error when glfs_fini() > fails. I am tempted to just skip this error in most tests and have only > tests/basic/gfapi/libgfapi-fini-hang error out on it. (Obviously also > intend to fix the failure.) If you fix the bug in glfs_fini() then it should not be necessary to ignore the failure in the tests, right? Just fix the bug, don't hack the test. -- Kaleb
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
