Re: Suggestions for improving the block/gluster driver in QEMU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:04:43PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 04:43 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > posix_discard() in gluster seems to be using fallocate() with
> > > >FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE flag. And posix_zerofill() can be made smarter to use
> > > >FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE and fallback to writing zeroes if ZERO_RANGE is not
> > > >supported.
> > Oh, nice find! I was expecting that posix_zerofill() uses fallocate()
> > already... Definitely something that shoud be improved too. Care to file
> > a bug for that?
> Sent http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15037/ :-)

Or like that, thanks!

Niels

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux