Re: Support to reclaim locks (posix) provided lkowner & range matches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2016 08:44 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
Hi,

In certain scenarios (esp.,in highly available environments), the
application may have to fail-over/connect to a different glusterFS
client while the I/O is happening. In such cases until there is a ping
timer expiry and glusterFS server cleans up the locks held by the older
glusterFS client, the application will not be able to reclaim their lost
locks. To avoid that we need support in Gluster to let clients reclaim
the existing locks provided lkwoner and the lock range matches.


If the server detects a disconnection, it goes about cleaning up the locks held by the disconnected client. Only if the failover connection happens before this server cleanup the outlined scheme would work. Since there is no ping timer on the server, do you propose to have a grace timer on the server?


For client-side support, I am thinking if we can integrate with the new
lock API being introduced as part of mandatory lock support in gfapi [2]


Is glfs_file_lock() planned to be used here? If so, how do we specify that it is a reclaim lock in this api?

We also would need to pass the reclaim_lock flag over rpc.

-Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux