On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> I attempted to get us more space on NetBSD by creating a new partition called
> /data and putting /build as a symlink to /data/build. This has caused
> problems
> with tests/basic/quota.t. It's marked as bad for master, but not for
> release-3.7. This is possibly because we have a hard-coded grep for
> /build/install against df -h.
For the benefit of anyone else looking at this, the grep actually seems to be
in volume.rc and not in the test itself.That's right - it appears to have been done to exclude the install path components from the df output which is what is being done to find the aux mount. Is there a better way to figure out if the aux mount is running?
> Nithya has spent the last 2 days debugging
> without much success. What's a good way forward here? Mark the test as
> failing for 3.7?Right. Something went wrong with the system and it refused to run the tests after a while.
I don't think so. There are 13 tests that use the affected function
(get_aux). Do we want to disable 13 tests? I think we actually need
to fix the function instead. It seems to me that the check we're
making is very hacky in two ways:
Checking for both /run and /var/run instead of using GLUSTERD_WORKDIR
Excluding /build/install for no obvious reason at allThis looks like it was done to remove the /build/install components from the df -h outputs. Changing the path to /data/build/install broke this as it did not strip the "/data" from the paths.It did work when I changed the sed to act on /data/build/install but hardcoded paths are not a good approach.
Give me some time, I can send out a patch to print out the default run directory if that helps?
something similar to 'gluster --print-logdir'. What shall we call this? 'gluster --print-rundir'? it will
These auxiliary mounts should be in a much more specific place, and we
should check for that instead of looking for any that might exist. Who
knows where that place is? I've copied Raghavendra G as the quota
maintainer, since that seems like our best bet.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
