Re: Bugs with incorrect status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:43:58AM +0200, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
> I think there's a problem with the script that generates this report. The
> changes I2fac59 and Ie1934f are bound to bug 1332054, not 1236065.

Thanks!

Hmm, the script uses Gerrits search capabilities for matching bugs with
changes. This is what gets executed in the end:

  message:"BUG:1236065"
  http://review.gluster.org/#/q/message:%22BUG:%201236065%22
  (the script add "branch" and "status" filters too)

Searching with(out) spaces does not make a difference. This query seems
to match the "bug-1236065.t" filename in the subject of the patch.

I'll try to figure out how to really match the "^BUG: ###" string, but
maybe Gerrit isnt capable of doing that :-/

Niels


> 
> Xavi
> 
> On 06/05/16 10:41, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > 1236065 (mainline) MODIFIED: Disperse volume: FUSE I/O error after self healing the failed disk files
> >   [master] I2fac59 cluster/ec: Fix spurious failure of test bug-1236065.t (NEW)
> >   [master] Ie1934f disperse: mark bug-1236065.t as bad_test (MERGED)
> >   [master] I225e31 cluster/ec: Fix tracking of good bricks (MERGED)
> >   ** xhernandez@xxxxxxxxxx: Bug 1236065 should be in POST, change I2fac59 under review **

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux