Re: Mandatory Locks support for GlusterFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 06:29 +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> As part of preparing GlusterFS to cope with Multi-protocol
> environment,
> it is necessary to have mandatory locks support within the file
> system
> with respect to its integration to protocols like NFS or SMB. This
> will
> allow clients which require mandatory locks to apply for the same
> instead of the default advisory mode locks. GlusterFS native clients
> can still live with their current advisory lock semantics. Apart from
> linux-style mandatory locks, which is enforced based on file mode
> bits,
> this feature enables us to force the entire volume to either strictly
> follow mandatory lock semantics or to have a mixed environment where
> both advisory and mandatory locks exists on their own. Please
> see/review [1] for detailed design doc and add your
> suggestions/comments as early as possible.
> 
> [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
> 

Updated the design doc with explanation on nature of proposed change.

> Thanks,
> --Anoop C S.
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux