[1] changes the retry behavior of write-behind in case of flush failures. Do you think it needs to be called out in release notes? [1] http://review.gluster.org/12594 regards, Raghavendra ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Niels de Vos" <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Raghavendra Bhat" > <rabhat@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Dan Lambright" <dlambrig@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Nithya Balachandran" <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 6:52:25 AM > Subject: Re: 3.7.9 update > > A quick update - 3.7.9 has been tagged in the repository. Will send out > an announcement once the packages and release notes are ready. > > Thanks, > Vijay > > > On 03/13/2016 01:20 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > I have been running tests with the latest HEAD of release-3.7 on a 2x2 > > distributed replicated volume. Here are some updates: > > > > - Write Performance has seen an improvement as seen by running > > perf-test.sh [1] > > > > > > v3.7.9 with FUSE client > > > > Testname Time > > emptyfiles_create 961.83 > > emptyfiles_delete 600.08 > > smallfiles_create 1508.38 > > smallfiles_rewrite 1325.60 > > smallfiles_read 598.50 > > smallfiles_reread 384.65 > > smallfiles_delete 623.66 > > largefile_create 18.33 > > largefile_rewrite 19.17 > > largefile_read 11.44 > > largefile_reread 0.31 > > largefile_delete 0.66 > > directory_crawl_create 981.21 > > directory_crawl 30.64 > > directory_recrawl 28.01 > > metadata_modify 1117.92 > > directory_crawl_delete 423.08 > > > > v3.7.8 with FUSE client > > > > Testname Time > > emptyfiles_create 953.87 > > emptyfiles_delete 577.46 > > smallfiles_create 1837.33 > > smallfiles_rewrite 2349.37 > > smallfiles_read 604.22 > > smallfiles_reread 394.48 > > smallfiles_delete 629.74 > > largefile_create 73.86 > > largefile_rewrite 76.23 > > largefile_read 11.36 > > largefile_reread 0.31 > > largefile_delete 0.65 > > directory_crawl_create 985.16 > > directory_crawl 31.10 > > directory_recrawl 26.94 > > metadata_modify 1422.60 > > directory_crawl_delete 382.57 > > > > Hopefully this addresses the write performance drop we observed with 3.7.8. > > > > - Regular file system test tools like iozone, dbench etc. are running > > fine with the fuse client. > > > > - Rolling upgrade from 3.7.8 to the latest release-3.7 HEAD worked fine > > with I/O happening from a fuse client. > > > > - There is a memory leak in FUSE client that I observed while running > > perf-test.sh. A statedump revealed that there was a ref leak on several > > inodes. I have sent a possible patch [2] which addressed problems in my > > test setup. This does need careful review and more testing. Given the > > memory leaks we have been observing with fuse, I feel that it would be > > good to review mount/fuse for possible leaks and run more tests before > > releasing 3.7.9. I am looking at pushing out tagging by 2-3 days to mid > > week to accomplish this. Niels, Raghavendra - can you provide additional > > help with reviewing here? > > > > - Tiering has seen a lot of patches in 3.7.9. Dan, Nithya - can you > > please assist in preparation of release notes by summarizing the changes > > and providing inputs on the general readiness of tiering? > > > > Thanks, > > Vijay > > > > [1] https://github.com/avati/perf-test/blob/master/perf-test.sh > > > > [2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13689/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
