Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 16:22 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a écrit : > > On 02/08/2016 04:16 PM, Ravishankar N wrote: > > [Removing Milind, adding Pranith] > > > > On 02/08/2016 04:09 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:05:44PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: > >>> The patch to add it to bad tests has already been merged, so I guess > >>> this > >>> .t's failure won't pop up again. > >> IMo that was a bit too quick. > > I guess Pranith merged it because of last week's complaint for the > > same .t and not wanting to block other patches from being merged. > > Yes, two people came to my desk and said their patches are blocked > because of this. So had to merge until we figure out the problem. I suspect it would be better if people did use the list rather than going to the desk, as it would help others who are either absent, in another office or even not working in the same company be aware of the issue. next time this happen, can you direct people to gluster-devel ? -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
