|
Hi All, We are facing an issue where inode_ctx is missing for some of the xlators, even though inode was already linked to inode table. This can happen if the inode was linked from any xlators which is loaded below master xlator. A similar problem was reported in bug 1297311 . To solve this problem we are thinking to force a lookup if the inode_ctx was not present on master xlators. We are assuming that, After the first successful lookup, every linked inode should have an inode_ctx in all xlators which stores an inode_ctx, ie as part of resolving an entry if inode_ctx was not present for master xlators, we are planning to send a lookup. Your suggestion and comments will be most welcome. Regards Rafi KC |
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
