Avra Sengupta <asengupt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Agree with your point. If we are ready to make exceptions, then we might > as well not block all the patches. As Jeff suggested, triaging the > nightly/weekly results manually and making any serious issues a blocker > should suffice. How are you going to make a serious issue a blocker? The serious issue will be related to multiple patches, it will be impossible to tell which one is the offender. If we go that way, we need to run a regression for each merged patch, which will be much less load than today. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
