Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd prefer a "defined level of effort" approach which *might* reduce the > benefit we derive from NetBSD testing but *definitely* keeps the cost > under control. Did we identify the worst offenders within the spurious failing tests? We could ignore their output on NetBSD (this is how I started). -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
