Re: Recognizing contributors and displaying other useful bits?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Ravishankar N wrote:
On 12/16/2015 07:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
Hi,

Many GUI tools provide an "About" box that displays some information
about the project. Some applications (Wireshark for example) go an extra
step by including a list of all people that contributed patches. That is
quite a nice way for contributors to see the appreciation of their work.

I think it would be really awesome if we could do something similar. We
have our reserved+hidden ".glusterfs" directory where all access is
denied. We could populate this directory with static compiled-in
contents. When accessed from a client, the licenses, versions, authors
and other bits could be displayed. A normal readdir should still not
list the directory at all (no change from current behaviour).

Any thoughts?

I think It would be better to revive the who-wrote-glusterfs reports
that Vijay used to send on the mailing list instead of statically adding
contributor names to code.
We could have a `gluster --credits` or `gluster--help`  cli that points
to gluster.org and maybe add a button thingy on the website which when
clicked runs the who-wrote-glusterfs.sh  on <whatever-branch>  and
displays the result. Things like version numbers and licenses are/should
be covered in gluster--version.

or a tshirt with contributors list on the back :)


But yes, if  we do want to expose this information via the mount point,
then maybe /mount/.meta is a good place.

Ummm.. makes sense.


My 2 cents.
Ravi



Niels


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


--
 > : Any porters out there should feel happier knowing that DEC is
shipping > : me an AlphaPC that I intend to try getting linux running
on: this will > : definitely help flush out some of the most flagrant
unportable stuff. > : The Alpha is much more different from the i386
than the 68k stuff is, so > : it's likely to get most of the stuff
fixed. > > It's posts like this that almost convince us non-believers
that there > really is a god. (A follow-up by
alovell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Anthony Lovell, to Linus's remarks about
porting)

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux