Original patch was proper, wondering which patch introduced this
issue. http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9503/13/glusterfs.spec.in Fixed now: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12577 and http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12578/ regards Aravinda On 11/12/2015 12:31 PM, Milind Changire
wrote:
They are indeed part of the geo-rep sub package ... the package listing (rpm -qlp) says so. But I guess if somebody attempts a server build without geo-replication then the gfind_missing_files will get appended to the %files ganesha section which is defined just above the %files geo-replication section. This needs to be corrected to push the gfind_missing_files inside the %{!?_without_georeplication:1} section under the %files geo-replication section. Need to get gfind_missing_files package ownership confirmed from Aravinda. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:the in-tree glusterfs.spec(.in) has them immediately following the geo-rep sub-package, but outside the %if ... %endif. Are they part of geo-rep? Or something else? -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel |
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel