-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/05/2015 07:08 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le jeudi 05 novembre 2015 à 12:44 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit : >> [fixed CC to gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx] >> >> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 06:13:52AM -0500, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: >>> <top post> How about devel.gluster.org? Or upload.gluster.org? >>> >>> Either one would be reasonable for nightly coverity/clang/etc >>> reports as well as community uploads? >>> >>> </top post> >> >> devel.gluster.org sounds good to me. We will use it for >> uploading, but also downloading, unless the uploads get >> replicated to download.gluster.org and we use that as the only >> public accessible download system. > > I am ok with that, but there is a risk of confusion with > dev.gluster.org :) That's just another name for review.gluster.org, right? I'm not sure why we need two names. > >> The nightly builds used to get uploaded to download.gluster.org >> too. A replacement system (+user) for that needs to accept scp >> from build.gluster.org and be able to download the built packages >> from Fedora COPR (was using an lftp script for that). > > I didn't think about this. > > I would like to have it separate from the main download, so we > could at least avoid polluting the download stats ( since they were > "skewed" by some mirrors downloading all nightlies in the past ), > and since we can afford to lose the nightlies, IIRC. > > But now, it depend on why do we use them, and what for. > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
