Re: GlusterD 2.0 status updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> - Support for SSL transports - thought we wouldn't be using this
>> initially, we would require it later on.
>
> Control-plane security is important enough that I think it has to
> be a Day One requirement.

I did mean this, but I could have expressed it better. What I meant to
say was that though we would not be using SSL for the first planned
milestone, the RPC framework we choose would need to support SSL as we
will be using it later on.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux