On Wednesday 02 September 2015 08:09 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 09/02/2015 03:12 AM, Aravinda wrote:
Geo-replication and Sharding Team today discussed about the approach
to make Sharding aware Geo-replication. Details are as below
Participants: Aravinda, Kotresh, Krutika, Rahul Hinduja, Vijay Bellur
- Both Master and Slave Volumes should be Sharded Volumes with same
configurations.
If I am not mistaken, geo-rep supports replicating to a non-gluster
local FS at the slave end. Is this correct? If so, would this limitation
not make that problematic?
With recent Gluster releases (>= 3.5), remote replication to a local
filesystem is no longer possible with geo-replication. Since
geo-replication's syncing relies on gfids rather than paths (for better
consistency), we lost the previous behavior.
-Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
